MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255393102 · doi:10.1079/bjn2002603

Low carbohydrate does not mean low glycaemic index!

2002· article· en· W4255393102 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thomas M.S. Wolever

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal Of Nutrition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycaemic indexIndex (typography)CarbohydrateContent (measure theory)Food scienceMedicineChemistryComputer scienceGlycemic indexInternal medicineMathematicsInsulinWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nutrition Discussion ForumLow carbohydrate does not mean low glycaemic index!*Dumesnil et al. (2001) reported the results of a study from Laval University, Que ´bec, in which overweight men were fed under metabolic ward conditions for 6 d on each of three different test diets.They concluded that: '. . .a lowglycaemic index-low-fat -high-protein diet can produce a marked decrease in ad libitum energy intake without increasing hunger or decreasing satiety while having rapid and marked effects on metabolic risk variables'.However, the authors have provided no evidence that the effects they observed were in any way due to the use of low-glycaemic-index (GI) foods.The conclusions related to GI are unjustified because the paper fails to demonstrate that the GI of their low-GI -lowfat -high-protein diet is less than that of the control (American Heart Association; Krauss et al. 1996) diet.The GI of neither experimental diet is given.An appendix is provided giving sample menus from each dietary regimen and showing the GI values of the foods in each diet.However, the information is imprecise: there are no weights of foods given, in some cases the specific food is not indicated.Three foods, wholewheat bread, unsweetened jam and fresh fruits, provide most of the carbohydrate in the low-GI diet.The GI values of bread and jam are indicated as being: 'Undetermined, but probably , 51'.The GI of 'fresh fruits' is listed as being 36-53.We have tested commercial varieties of wholewheat bread available in Canada, and wholewheat bread baked in our laboratory, on several occasions.The lowest value ever obtained was 65 (Wolever et al. 1994a), although the value obtained was usually closer to 71 (Jenkins et al. 1983a(Jenkins et al. ,b, 1986(Jenkins et al. , 1988;;Wolever et al. 1986 Wolever et al. , 1994a)).Thus wholewheat bread is not a low-GI food.The published GI values of certain popular tropical fruits, readily available in Canada, are higher than the maximum value of 53 given by the authors; e.g.ripe banana (all yellow skin, GI 54), over-ripe banana (few brown spots on skin, GI 64) (Wolever et al. 1988), pineapple (GI 66) and watermelon (GI 72) (Foster-Powell & Brand Miller, 1995).Since the fruits used are not indicated, it is not possible to verify that the GI values cited are correct.To the best of my knowledge, there is no published GI value for jam, although Jenkins (DJA Jenkins and C Kendal, personal communication) found the GI of strawberry jam to be 84.The carbohydrates in regular jam consist of the sugars in the fruit, plus the sucrose or other carbohydrate added to sweeten and thicken the jam.Fruits contain varying proportions of sucrose, fructose and glucose with some, such as pear, peach and apricot, *All glycaemic index values quoted in this article are given on the glucose standard, i.e. the glycaemic index of glucose ¼ 100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal Of NutritionSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207