Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prise en compte de la dimension environnementale dans la problmatique du dveloppement a, en quelque sorte, permis aux sciences de l'Homme de renouer, sur ce terrain spcifique, leur lien originel avec les sciences de la Nature. En effet, la question du dveloppement s'est d'abord pose essentiellement en termes conomiques. La ncessit de prendre en compte la dimension sociale -et, dans une moindre mesure, la dimension culturelle -du dveloppement ne s'est rellement impose que par le constat rpt des checs de l'application des modles strictement conomiques. Mais encore faut-il ajouter que cette prise de conscience de la dimension humaine du dveloppement n'a que trs rarement t problmatise dans les termes d'un savoir propre aux sciences de l'Homme. Tout semble s'tre pass comme si les sciences de l'Homme s'taient vues invites la table des rflexions sur le dveloppement pour rpondre des questions formules et formates selon une logique et des termes relevant d'une autre culture disciplinaire :
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".