Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous article FreeNotes on ContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreBrett Christophers is a professor in the Department of Social and Economic Geography at Uppsala University. He researches and teaches classes in economic and urban geography. His most recent book is The New Enclosure: The Appropriation of Public Land in Neoliberal Britain (Verso, 2018).Daniel Cunha is a PhD candidate in the sociology department at Binghamton University who works on the Industrial Revolution (ca. 1760–1840) with a focus on the mediation between British mechanization and commodity frontiers. Other research interests include critique of political economy, crisis theory, critical theory, and the problem of the Anthropocene. He is cofounder and coeditor of the Brazilian magazine Sinal de Menos (www.sinaldemenos.org).Benjamin Feldman is a PhD candidate in the history department at Georgetown University. He has taught the history of capitalism and twentieth-century American history. He is completing a dissertation on the role of the Third World in postwar American political thought. His most recent publication is “In Search of the Socialist Subject: Radical Political Economy and the Study of Moral Incentives in the Third World” in Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology.Jonathan Levy is a professor in the history department at the University of Chicago where he also participates on the Committee on Social Thought. He is the author of Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America (Harvard University Press, 2012) and Ages of American Capitalism (forthcoming).James Livesey is an applied eighteenth-century historian. He writes about the cultural, economic, and political conditions that allowed for significant innovation in the eighteenth century. He also works with colleagues in urban development and the creative economy in Dundee to apply insight to transformation. He is currently Dean of the School of Humanities at the University of Dundee and Codirector of InGame, an AHRC-funded Creative Economy Research and Development Project. His next book, Provincialising Global History, will be published by Yale University Press in January 2020.Alexia Yates is a lecturer in modern history at the University of Manchester, where she researches urban history and the history of economic life in Europe. Her first book, Selling Paris: Property and Commercial Culture in the Fin-de-siècle Capital (Harvard University Press, 2015), won the Wallace K. Ferguson Prize for Best Book in Non-Canadian History from the Canadian Historical Association in 2016. She is currently working on a book about the culture and politics of finance in modern France and is writing a short text on real estate and global urban history. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Historical Studies Volume 6, Number 2Fall 2019 Sponsored by the Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory (3CT) Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/706530 © 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".