MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255671619 · doi:10.1086/706530

Notes on Contributors

2019· article· en· W4255671619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Historical Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismPoliticsAppropriationEconomic historyCommoditySociologyPolitical scienceSocial sciencePolitical economyHistoryLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous article FreeNotes on ContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreBrett Christophers is a professor in the Department of Social and Economic Geography at Uppsala University. He researches and teaches classes in economic and urban geography. His most recent book is The New Enclosure: The Appropriation of Public Land in Neoliberal Britain (Verso, 2018).Daniel Cunha is a PhD candidate in the sociology department at Binghamton University who works on the Industrial Revolution (ca. 1760–1840) with a focus on the mediation between British mechanization and commodity frontiers. Other research interests include critique of political economy, crisis theory, critical theory, and the problem of the Anthropocene. He is cofounder and coeditor of the Brazilian magazine Sinal de Menos (www.sinaldemenos.org).Benjamin Feldman is a PhD candidate in the history department at Georgetown University. He has taught the history of capitalism and twentieth-century American history. He is completing a dissertation on the role of the Third World in postwar American political thought. His most recent publication is “In Search of the Socialist Subject: Radical Political Economy and the Study of Moral Incentives in the Third World” in Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology.Jonathan Levy is a professor in the history department at the University of Chicago where he also participates on the Committee on Social Thought. He is the author of Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America (Harvard University Press, 2012) and Ages of American Capitalism (forthcoming).James Livesey is an applied eighteenth-century historian. He writes about the cultural, economic, and political conditions that allowed for significant innovation in the eighteenth century. He also works with colleagues in urban development and the creative economy in Dundee to apply insight to transformation. He is currently Dean of the School of Humanities at the University of Dundee and Codirector of InGame, an AHRC-funded Creative Economy Research and Development Project. His next book, Provincialising Global History, will be published by Yale University Press in January 2020.Alexia Yates is a lecturer in modern history at the University of Manchester, where she researches urban history and the history of economic life in Europe. Her first book, Selling Paris: Property and Commercial Culture in the Fin-de-siècle Capital (Harvard University Press, 2015), won the Wallace K. Ferguson Prize for Best Book in Non-Canadian History from the Canadian Historical Association in 2016. She is currently working on a book about the culture and politics of finance in modern France and is writing a short text on real estate and global urban history. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Historical Studies Volume 6, Number 2Fall 2019 Sponsored by the Chicago Center for Contemporary Theory (3CT) Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/706530 © 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7770.690

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Historical StudiesSame topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207