MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Granuloma Annulare 

2013· article· en· W4255793045 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander K. C. Leung, Benjamin Barankin, Kam‐Lun Ellis Hon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Diseases and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranuloma annulareMedicineDermatologyAsymptomaticPathologyGranuloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Granuloma annulare is a benign, usually self-limited granulomatous disease of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. Several distinct subtypes have been recognized, namely localized granuloma annulare, generalized or disseminated granuloma annulare, subcutaneous granuloma annulare, papular granuloma annulare, interstitial or patch granuloma annulare, and perforating granuloma annulare. Localized granuloma annulare is the most common form in children and comprises 75% of cases. Clinically, the condition is characterized by asymptomatic, flesh-colored or erythematous-brown papules, frequently arranged in a ring or annular pattern on the distal extremities. It is estimated that 0.1 to 0.4% of new patients attending dermatologic clinics have granuloma annulare. Most cases of granuloma annulare occur before the age of 30 years. A delayed hypersensitivity and cell-mediated immune response to an antigen contributes to the pathogenesis. Histologic examination of the lesion shows central collagen degeneration and mucin deposition surrounded peripherally by palisading histiocytes and inflammatory cells. Most cases of granuloma annulare are asymptomatic and self-limited; and reassurance is often sufficient. Treatment is mainly for cosmetic purposes and various modalities of treatment options are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Pediatrics and Child HealthSame topicSkin Diseases and DiabetesFrench-language works237,207