Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", The Physicality of Leadership: Gesture, Entanglement, Taboo, Possibilities (Monographs in Leadership and Management, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xi-xii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120140000006018 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Ralph Bathurst Massey University, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand Donatella De Paoli Norwegian Business School BI, Oslo, Norway David Gilling New Zealand Symphony Orchestra, Wellington, New Zealand Wendelin Küpers Karlshochschule International University, Karlsruhe, Germany Anne Messervy Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland, New Zealand Donna Ladkin University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK Mary Phillips University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Arja Ropo University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland Erika Sauer University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland Amanda Sinclair Melbourne Business School, The University of Melbourne, Australia Claus Springborg Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, UK John Paul Stephens Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA Ian Sutherland IEDC–Bled School of Management, Bled, Slovenia; WUT Business School, Poland; Memorial University, Canada; and Peter Pribilla Stiftung – Technische Universität München, Germany Steven S. Taylor Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA Lloyd Williams Whitecliffe College of Arts and Design, Auckland, New Zealand Book Chapters The Physicality of Leadership: Gesture, Entanglement, Taboo, Possibilities Monographs in Leadership and Management The Physicality of Leadership: Gesture, Entanglement, Taboo, Possibilities Copyright Page About the Editors List of Contributors Acknowledgements Introduction: The Physicality of Leadership: ‘Ceci N’est Pas Une Pipe’ Leading a Group through Feeling: Teaching by the Movement of Learning Flying Blind? Teaching Aesthetic Agency in an Executive MBA Course Disappearing Bodies in Virtual Leadership? To be Physical is to Inter-Be-Come – Beyond Empiricism and Idealism towards Embodied Leadership that Matters From Mahler to the Movies: Physical Empathy in Orchestral Leadership Music Beyond the Chamber: NZTrio and Embodied Communities Leadership, Eroticism and Abjection: Star Trek and the Borg Queen On Knees, Breasts and Being Fully Human in Leadership Bill Clinton and the End of Leadership ‘In through the Nose, out through the Mouth’: How Conscious Breathing Can Help Mere Mortals Cope with the Difficulties of Leading Open Your Heart About the Authors
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.715 | 0.707 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".