Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Jack London and the Klondike Gold Rush by Peter Lourie Elizabeth Bush Lourie, Peter Jack London and the Klondike Gold Rush; illus. by Wendell Minor and with photographs. Ottaviano/Holt, 2017 [192p] Trade ed. ISBN 978-0-8050-9757-3 $18.99 E-book ed. ISBN 978-0-8050-9758-0 $9.99 Reviewed from galleys R Gr. 5-8 Kids who find Call of the Wild or White Fang on a required reading list eventually learn that author Jack London had experienced the Yukon first hand. Lourie’s account finds London well before his writing days, focusing solely on London’s 1897 trek into the Klondike gold fields—a bit too late for the initial big strikes that set off the Stampede, and a bit too early for the human onslaught that would swell the population of Dawson and leave thousands of fortune seekers destitute. Lourie’s command of the Stampeders’ trials is first rate, and London’s personal experiences are in many ways typical of the 1897 adventurers who invested all they had, fought their way over the Chilkoot Pass, braved the rapids on their way to Dawson in leaky handmade boats, and arrived (if they were very lucky) in time to stake and register claims that would change their lives. Indeed, like so many of his fellow adventurers, London’s life did change—just not in the way he had envisioned. Forced by scurvy to leave after one season, London returned with plots, observations, and character studies that would make him, “at the age of twenty-seven … the most famous and highly paid writer in the world.” Though Lourie takes a liberty or two in his text and Minor’s gauzy black and white scenes are expendable, this will [End Page 323] nonetheless scratch the itch for readers who love a great true adventure tale, and if it scores them bonus points with the English teacher, so much the better. An index, timeline, and glossary are included. Copyright © 2017 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it