Three optimization formulations for an inverse problem in saddle point problems with applications to elasticity imaging of locating tumor in incompressible medium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work focuses on identifying a distributed parameter in a saddle point problem with application to the elasticity imaging inverse problem. We examine three optimization formulations for the inverse problem, namely, the output least-squares (OLS), the modified output least-squares (MOLS), and the energy output least-squares (EOLS). The OLS functional and the EOLS functional are, in general, nonconvex; however, we show that the MOLS functional is convex. We provide existence results for optimization problems involving the regularized variants of the OLS, the EOLS, and the MOLS functional. We give first-order and second-order adjoint methods in the continuous setting to compute the first-order and the second-order derivative of the OLS/EOLS functionals. The derivative of the MOLS objective does not involve the derivative of the solution map and hence does not require the adjoint approach. We provide numerical experimentation on tissue phantom data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it