Tronchet et la réorganisation constituante des institutions judiciaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Philippe Tessier, Tronchet and the Reorganization of Judicial Institutions during the Constituent Assembly . François Denis Tronchet, known for his participation in the Trial of the King and for his contribution to the writing of the Civil Code of 1804, played an important role during the Constituent Assembly in the reorganization of judicial institutions of the Old Regime, notably in the reform of criminal procedure. Though he was soon called the « Nestor of the Aristocracy », he appears at the same time as attached to certain traditions and as an ardent promoter of reform, and as such could be considered as a man of compromise and transition. In fact, Tronchet used the experience he acquired as a lawyer to develop pragmatic solutions, concrete and humane. These solutions for compromise were often inspired by the ideal of moderation, by a defense of equability, and a rejection of barbarity, a repellent concept designing at once the Old Regime and certain foreign practices ; this set of ideas is closely associated with the model of a lawyer, that he incarnates, while rejecting judicial corporate structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".