Parameter extraction of interdigital slow-wave coplanar waveguide circuits using finite difference frequency domain algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The slow wave effect can be obtained by a capacitively loaded structure with a symmetrical interdigital line connected on both sides of the coplanar waveguide (CPW) central line. The ferroelectric thin film with high dielectric constant can reduce the size of circuit and make it possible to realize tunable devices such as filter by applying voltage on it. Actually, this kind of slow wave structure is a periodic guided-wave structure and can be analyzed by using classic finite difference frequency domain (FDFD) method for periodic guided-wave structures. However, the very compact slow-wave structures will usually result in simulation errors when the classic FDFD method is adopted, which will lead to a nonsymmetrical generalized eigenvalue problem. In this article, the shift-and-invert (SI) Arnoldi method is used to directly resolve this nonsymmetrical generalized eigenvalue problem. As a result, the accuracy of FDFD algorithm is improved. Especially for the large scale eigenvalue problem, SI method can also have a very fast speed of calculation. By means of its complex propagation constant obtained from simulation, one can extract circuit parameters of the interdigital capacitor. Consequently, one can analyze and design relevant resonators and filters in a quick and accurate manner, which are constructed with such interdigital slow wave structures. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J RF and Microwave CAE, 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it