MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4256281020 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14661387

Real-time classification of muscle signals from self-selected intentional movements

2021· preprint· en· W4256281020 on OpenAlexaff
Kaveh Momen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilhouetteLogarithmFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Movement (music)MathematicsFeature vectorElectromyographyArtificial intelligenceRoot mean squareComputer scienceSpeech recognitionStatisticsAlgorithmMathematical analysisEngineeringPsychologyPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel method to automatically differentiate forearm movements has been proposed. The electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from two muscle sites on the forearm in real-time. Two 2-dimensional feature spaces namely the natural logarithm of root-mean-square values (Log (RMS)), and the standard deviations of auto regressive model coefficients (Stdev (AR)) were created. The features were calculated within non-overlapping 0.2 second windows in real-time. The feature spaces were clustered using the fuzzy c-means algorithm [1]. The cluster multiplicities were investigated by five different cluster validity indices. Real-time EMG signal classification was achieved by calculating membership values. Log (RMS) performed superior to the Stdev (AR) feature space. The silhouette validity index provided the best cluster validity index in this study. On average, the proposed algorithm classified 4 movements with 92.7± 3.2% and 5 movements with 79.90%±16.8% accuracy. The algorithm also revealed the number of repeatable movements. It can also be adapted to daily variations in individual EMG signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→