MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4256476373 · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01028-5

Correction to: Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes

2020· article· en· W4256476373 on OpenAlexaff
Muriel Buri, Armin Curt, John D. Steeves, Torsten Hothorn

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Research Methodology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaseline (sea)OddsStatisticsOrdinal regressionOrdered logitComputer scienceMEDLINEOrdinal dataOdds ratioMedicineMedical physicsEconometricsMathematicsLogistic regressionPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.109
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.662
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1090.662
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.014
Bibliometrics0.0100.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0090.005
Research integrity0.0100.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3430.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.770
GPT teacher head0.584
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical Research MethodologySame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207