Characterization of on‐chip miniature multilayer spiral inductors for RFICS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several existing closed‐form equations for calculating DC inductance and resistance of single‐spiral inductors are examined at first, and the most accurate formula is chosen for characterizing the DC inductance of multilayer spiral inductors. The partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) method is implemented for computing their frequency‐dependent (AC) resistance and inductance. To validate our calculated results, we designed and fabricated some multilayer spiral inductors using standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology. The on‐chip measurements are carried out so as to obtain two‐port S‐parameters of these inductors. Excellent agreements are obtained between the calculated and experimental results, which include DC and low‐frequency inductances of three‐, four‐, and fiver‐layer spiral inductors, respectively. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 49: 3180–3184, 2007; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).DOI 10.1002/mop.22920
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".