MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4115: Naturally circulating anti-LAG3 antibodies exist in cancer patients

2019· article· en· W4256578589 on OpenAlexaff
Ilya Tsimafeyeu, П.В. Ершов, Leonid Kaluzhskiy, Jean-Philippe Couture, Hugo Gagnon, Vladimir V. Kuznetsov, Aleksei Kalachev, Ivanov As, Gennady Bratslavsky

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsAptose Biosciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerAntibodyBusinessComputer scienceMedicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To date there was no evidence of existence of the naturally circulating antibodies to checkpoint receptors in humans. LAG3 checkpoint is crucial in modulation of immune response that is altered in humans with inflammatory and malignant conditions. We have previously described novel methodology in identification of diagnostic and therapeutic antibodies (US Patent #9810694). Here we report identification of novel potentially therapeutic fully human anti-LAG3 antibodies in cancer patients.Anti-LAG3 antibody presence was evaluated in 25 individuals: 11 healthy donors (controls) and 14 cancer patients in two different laboratories blinded to clinical information. Surface plasmon resonance analysis was done using the optical biosensor BiacoreT200 where LAG3 protein was covalently immobilized on the optical chip and biosensor signals from human serum samples were analyzed. Western Blotting used recombinant LAG3 loaded on a 10% SDS PAGE followed by blotting with plasma samples followed by biotinylated anti-human IgA/IgG/IgM and IrDye 800 streptavidin. Plasma anti-LAG3 IP utilized recombinant LAG3 crosslinked to MagResyn Carboxyl beads followed by incubation with plasma, followed by a biotinylated anti human IgA/IgG/IgMand IrDye streptavidin. No anti-LAG3 antibodies were detected in control group.Among three assays there was complete correlation for presence of anti-LAG3 antibody in 3 cancer patients. One of these patients had sufficient plasma quantity and anti-LAG3 concentration (21 - 33 µg/ml) that should allow for the antibody purification and de novo sequencing. The novel fully human anti-LAG3 antibody will be identified, purified, and the sequence will be determined.To our knowledge this is the first report of checkpoint antibody presence in humans. Further study with cloning and evaluation of therapeutic properties of novel fully human anti-LAG3 antibody in xenograft models will be performed.Citation Format: Ilya Tsimafeyeu, Pavel Ershov, Leonid Kaluzhskiy, Jean-Philippe Couture, Hugo Gagnon, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Aleksei Kalachev, Alexis Ivanov, Gennady Bratslavsky. Naturally circulating anti-LAG3 antibodies exist in cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4115.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207