Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "List of Contributors", Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9152(2013)0000004024 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Michel Avital Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Frank Barrett Naval Postgraduate School, USA Ilma Barros-Pose Fowler Center for Sustainable Value, USA Kathy Becker Center for Appreciative Inquiry, USA Kristin Bodiford Community Strengths, USA Brodie Boland New America Foundation, Canada David S. Bright Wright State University, USA Gervase R. Bushe Simon Fraser University, Canada David L. Cooperrider Case Western Reserve University, USA Irma Firbida George Mason University, USA Ronald E. Fry Case Western Reserve University, USA Kenneth J. Gergen Swarthmore College, USA Lindsey N. Godwin Champlain College, USA Pamela C. Johnson Johnson-Haefling Foundation, USA Pascal Kaplan iCohere, USA Molly McGuigan Learning Link LLC, USA Matthew Moehle Positive Change Core, USA C. J. Murphy Spark 5 Consulting, USA Edward H. Powley Naval Postgraduate School, USA Jim Pulliam Center for Appreciative Inquiry, USA Bonnie A. Richley Case Western Reserve University, USA Melissa Robaina Center for Appreciative Inquiry, USA Marge Schiller Positive Change Core, USA Tiffany Schroeder Case Western Reserve University, USA Kimberley Seitz Kaleidoscope Business Coaching and Consulting, USA Dave Sherman The Energy Collaborative, USA Tojo Thatchenkery George Mason University, USA Cheri Torres Innovation Partners International, USA Rombout van den Nieuwenhof ZENO Organisatieontwikkeling, The Netherlands Wietske van Osch Michigan State University, USA Trevor Warner Strength Forward, LLC, USA Eric Woychik The Energy Collaborative, USA Danielle P. Zandee Nyenrode Business Universiteit, The Netherlands Book Chapters Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation Advances in Appreciative Inquiry Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation Copyright Page List of Contributors Preface Foreword A Contemporary Commentary on Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life The Process of Generative Inquiry Generative Process, Generative Outcome: The Transformational Potential of Appreciative Inquiry The Generative Archetypes of Idea Work The Generative Potential of Cynical Conversations The Language of Change: Generativity in Dialogical Processes Transcending the Polarity of Light and Shadow in Appreciative Inquiry: An Appreciative Exploration of Practice The Spark, the Flame, and the Torch: The Positive Arc of Systemic Strengths in the Appreciative Inquiry Design Summit The Exponential Inquiry Effect Magnified: The New AI Summit in a Technologically Connected World Strategic Convening for Generative Impact: Enabling Systemic Change in Complex Environments Collective Actualization: An Interpretation of Rogers’ Necessary Conditions for Change Ensuring Generativity Beyond the AI Summit Event: A Practical Guide for Designing an AI Summit and Advancing Post-Summit Momentum Exploring Transformative Innovation Through a World Inquiry The Generative Diffusion of Innovation Generative Mobilization: Appreciative Social Movements The Evolution of Appreciative Inquiry: A Novel Approach in the Making Appreciative Intelligence and Generativity: A Case Study of Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Facility Cleanup The Macon Miracle: The Magic of Intergenerational Design for the Future of Education Intergenerational Appreciative Inquiry: Caring for the Future Together
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.698 | 0.691 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".