MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 9944: Temporal Relationship Between Major Hemorrhagic Events and Mortality among Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights from ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51

2012· article· en· W42577027 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri B. Pride, Satishkumar Mohanavelu, Jessica L. Mega, Eugene Braunwald, C. Michael Gibson

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsGibson Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromeTIMICardiologyInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Multiple studies have demonstrated an association between hemorrhagic events and long-term mortality among patients with ACS. The goals of this analysis were to (1) describe risk factors associated with non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding and (2) determine whether there was a temporal relationship in the association between hemorrhagic events and mortality. Methods and results: ATLAS ACS-TIMI 51 enrolled patients with recent ACS and followed them for clinical outcomes for a median of 13 months. Multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusting for treatment and baseline characteristics were used to determine independent risk factors for non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding. To analyze the hazard ratio and time dependency of bleeding on mortality, we used iterative day-to-day landmark analyses after the hemorrhagic event. Of the 15,526 patients enrolled, 196 (1.26%) had a non-CABG-related TIMI major bleed. Independent predictors of non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding (p<0.10) included assignment to rivaroxaban, increasing age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, revascularization for the index event and region of enrollment. Non-CABG-related TIMI major bleeding was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality, even after adjusting for baseline differences (HRadj 5.94, 95% CI 4.2-8.5, p<0.001). However, in the iterative landmark analysis, the hazard ratio did not differ statistically from baseline risk by 12 days after the bleeding event (Figure). Furthermore, in a landmark analysis, there was no difference in mortality among 30-day survivors of major bleeding compared with propensity-matched controls (3.9% vs. 4.1%, p=NS). Conclusions: Among patients with recent ACS, major bleeding is associated with higher mortality, even after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. However, the relationship between major bleeding and mortality is no longer significant 12 days after the bleeding event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207