Woman as a Wonder as a Monster: On Mathilde the Woman Who Loses A Sex War/FEMME MERVEILLE OU FEMME MONSTER: SUR MATHILDE, LA FEMME QUI PERD UNE GUERRE DE SEXE SOMMAIRE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: In Stendhal's The Red and Black, second leading female character Mathilde appears quite monstrous young yet with fascination. She is neither mystery nor enigma but simply psychological sex man+woman woman in my concept, dilemma typical Her as Other as an Object meanwhile self-consciously struggling for subjectivity, for transcendence. Noble, proud, passionate, little hysteric, obsessed with fantasy. There buried, repressed deep, and, hidden skilfully in her is 'masculinity' in her 120% femininity. She takes efforts to behave like woman, yet she seeks to realize her transcendence in man she loves. Though man, Julien, shares with her same wild imagination and ambition, though both are addicted to dream heroism, he finally comes to point not loving her any more, for he gets tired heroism. Mathilde loses in war, for she fights, but fights in order to realize her heroism in in her lover, man. Key words: psychological sex; sex war; French Feminism; transcendence; rival Resume: Dans Le Rouge et le Noir de Stendhal, le deuxieme personnage feminin Mathilde semble plutot une monstrueuse jeune femme avec fascination. Dans mon concept, elle n'est ni mystere ni enigme, mais simplement d'un sexe psychologique homme + femme un dilemme typique d'Elle et d'Autre comme un Objet, et en meme temps elle lutte avec une auto-conscience pour la subjectivite et la transcendance. Noble, fiere, passionnee, un peu hysterique, obsedee par la fantaisie. Il y est enterree, refloulee profondement et dissimulee habilement en elle une de masculinite dans sa 120% de feminite. Elle prend des efforts pour se comporter comme une femme, mais elle cherche realiser sa transcendance l'homme qu'elle aime. Bien que cet homme, Julien, partage avec elle la meme imagination sauvage et l'ambition, et qu'ils soient adonnes au reve de l'heroisme, il finit enfin par ne plus l'aimer, car il se fatigue de l'heroisme. Mathilde perd la guerre. Elle se bat, mais elle se bat pour realiser son l'heroisme dans l'amour, chez son amant, un homme. Mots-Cles: sexe psychologique; la guerre de sexe; le feminisme francais; transcendence; rival Their first encounter was one their gazes: Julien thought that he had never seen beautiful eyes, signaling great emotional coldness , watchful boredom that none less remains mindful duty to appear imposing; they glitter. Mathilde saw as well that Julien had beautiful eyes, and nervousness made them shine, now hesitantly, now radiantly when he had given good answer. This is prophetic fatality between Julien and Mathilde, and much in contrast with Julien's first meeting Mme de Renal: she saw his pale face with signs recent tears, so fair complexion; were standing very close together, while Julien found her with such dazzling complexion. At that moment reader has the first discreet hint of skin-to-skin closeness Julien and Mme de Renal will attain, gentle eyes saw in each other later witness their passionate, genuine, far more innocent love. Stendhal himself claims that Mme de Renal represents natural love, true heart, while Mathilde de la Mole represents love head . But it's not simple at all as to relationship between Julien and this fabulous Mathilde. 1. LOVERS Mathilde, marquis's daughter, an aristocratic girl nineteen, is herself quite extraordinary: beautiful, witty, spoiled, wildly imaginative; her pride knows no bounds; arrogant that she gets bored with her own position and circle, arrogant that if he is only a common sort person, her window will be right hermetically shut. Now she finds newly arrived Julien, her father's secretary only, son carpenter from Verrieres, yet with fresh ideas, unquestionable superiority in Horace; he, later, when learning art hypocrisy Paris high society, turning into dandy, behaves with exemplary coldness towards her. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".