Globalization and Post-Secondary Education Policy in Canada:A Review of Trends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2005, provincial governments in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador each commissioned comprehensive public post-secondary education and training system reviews. While there are considerable differences between the systems and policy approaches in these jurisdictions, the final reports of each of these reviews provide an interesting repository of current post-secondary policy tendencies in Canada. The principal arguments and recommendations put forward in the review reports demonstrate the pervasive influence of economic globalization and the continuing shift to a more utilitarian and market-oriented ideological outlook on post-secondary education’s raison d'être. The policies advocated by both reviews illustrate, to varying extents, the impact of dominant influences on modern post-secondary policies including workforce training, privatization, marketization, internationalization and quality assessment mechanisms. En 2005, les gouvernements provinciaux de l'Ontario et de Terre-Neuve et Labrador ont commandé séparément des comptes-rendus détaillés sur les systèmes publiques d'enseignement et de formation au niveau post- secondaire. Quoiqu'il y ait bien des différences entre les systèmes et les approches politiques des deux provinces, chacun des comptes-rendus finals devient un répertoire intéressant des tendances en cours de la politique de l’éducation post-secondaire. Les recommendations et arguments principaux présentés dans ces comptes-rendus démontrent l'influence envahissante de la mondialisation économique et le changement continu vers une perspective idéologique plus utilitaire et plus orientée vers la commercialisation sur la raison d'être de l'enseignement post-secondaire. Les recommandations de ces deux comptes-rendus démontrent l'effet des influences dominantes sur la politique de l’éducation post-secondaire moderne pour y incorporer la formation de la main-d'œuvre; la privatisation et la commercialisation et les mécanismes d'évaluation de la qualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".