MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280492758 · doi:10.1007/s42650-022-00066-2

Correction to: Migration into and out of Indian Reserves Between 2011 and 2016: a Study Using Census Data Linkage

2022· article· en· W4280492758 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrice Dion, Jean-Dominique Morency

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Studies in Population · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusLinkage (software)GeographyDemographyGenealogyDemographic economicsRegional sciencePopulationSociologyEconomicsHistoryBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

30 Multilevel models are often used to account for study design, when observations are drawn from a sample of larger units (clusters, regions, for example) and the choice of that unit has an impact on the outcome (outcomes are correlated within a unit).But this is not an incentive since all units of interest were sampled evenly (in fact, all units of interest were sampled, period).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.181
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.181
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2680.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Studies in PopulationSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207