ENSINO DA LÍNGUA INGLESA EM TEMPOS DE ENSINO REMOTO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A literatura possui diversas tipificações e abordagens, que se manifestam em obras literárias. A literatura infanto-juvenil ocupa um papel estratégico no ensino de Literatura no ensino fundamental, com obras literárias que possuem linguagem e abordagem de temas condizentes com as demandas de aprendizagem de uma geração de alunos, que se encontram já inseridos na cibercultura. O objetivo deste estudo consiste em discutir sobre os desafios em se desenvolver estratégias de ensino para trabalhar as obras de literatura infanto-juvenil no ensino fundamental, considerando o contexto de cibercultura. Este estudo se caracteriza como uma pesquisa bibliográfica. A relevância deste estudo consiste na importância de se desenvolver o ensino de Literatura no ensino fundamental, por meio de estratégias de ensino e obras literárias que atendam as demandas de aprendizagem dos alunos. As estratégias de ensino de Literatura podem trabalhar as obras literárias infanto-juvenis por meio do diálogo entre o leitor e o texto, utilizando-se de diversas formas de interações disponibilizadas pela cultura impressa e pela cibercultura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".