Lateral loading behavior of the poplar LVL light wood shear wall
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poplar laminated veneer lumber (poplar LVL) is made of fast-growing poplar veneer and structural adhesive, which can well meet the developing requirement of the modern wood structures. This paper mainly focuses on the lateral loading behavior of the poplar LVL shear wall. For this purpose, six shear wall specimens with different opening types were fabricated and tested under the action of monotonic and cyclic loading. Performances were analyzed on the failure pattern, the load-displacement curve, the shear strength, the ultimate displacement, the elastic lateral stiffness, and the energy dissipation. To strengthen the corner joint, an innovative custom-designed hold-down was adopted, and the mechanical performance was also considered. The results showed that the failure of the specimen was mainly due to the yield of the nails and the separation between the stud and the base plate, while the hold-down can greatly improve the shear strength, the ultimate displacement, and the energy dissipation performance of the poplar LVL shear wall without openings. At last, the evaluation formula of the bearing capacity for the light wood shear wall is proposed so as to promote the theoretical basis for the application of poplar LVL in the light wood frame construction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".