One-Year Outcomes of Early, Compassionate Use of the PASCAL Ace Implant System for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Continued development of transcatheter mitral repair technologies is needed to address the large and diverse population of high-risk patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). The new PASCAL Ace implant system, with its narrower profile, complements the original PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system. The aim of this study is to report 1-year outcomes from the early, compassionate-use observational experience with the novel PASCAL Ace implant system. Methods: After heart team assessment, adults with symptomatic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR despite optimal medical therapy were treated under compassionate use at 3 hospitals internationally. Data were prospectively collected, and outcomes were assessed over a 12-month follow-up period. Results: < 0.001). Conclusions: At 1 year, the PASCAL Ace implant system demonstrated feasibility in this early, compassionate use experience in a small group of symptomatic patients with anatomically complex MR. The unique features of the PASCAL Ace implant may expand the treatable MR population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it