Mendelian Randomization Analysis Identifies Blood Tyrosine Levels as a Biomarker of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complex disease associated with premature mortality. Its diagnosis is challenging, and the identification of biomarkers causally influenced by NAFLD may be clinically useful. We aimed at identifying blood metabolites causally impacted by NAFLD using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) with validation in a population-based biobank. Our instrument for genetically predicted NAFLD included all independent genetic variants from a recent genome-wide association study. The outcomes included 123 blood metabolites from 24,925 individuals. After correction for multiple testing, a positive effect of NAFLD on plasma tyrosine levels but not on other metabolites was identified. This association was consistent across MR methods and was robust to outliers and pleiotropy. In observational analyses performed in the Estonian Biobank (10,809 individuals including 359 patients with NAFLD), after multivariable adjustment, tyrosine levels were positively associated with the presence of NAFLD (odds ratio per 1 SD increment = 1.23 [95% confidence interval = 1.12–1.36], p = 2.19 × 10−5). In a small proof-of-concept study on bariatric surgery patients, blood tyrosine levels were higher in patients with NAFLD than without. This study revealed a potentially causal effect of NAFLD on blood tyrosine levels, suggesting it may represent a new biomarker of NAFLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".