MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280518047 · doi:10.1186/s13007-022-00894-y

Banana plant counting and morphological parameters measurement based on terrestrial laser scanning

2022· article· en· W4280518047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Methods · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersChinese Universities Scientific Fund
KeywordsPoint cloudMathematicsHorticultureMean squared errorStatisticsBiologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The number of banana plants is closely related to banana yield. The diameter and height of the pseudo-stem are important morphological parameters of banana plants, which can reflect the growth status and vitality. To address the problems of high labor intensity and subjectivity in traditional measurement methods, a fast measurement method for banana plant count, pseudo-stem diameter, and height based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was proposed. RESULTS: First, during the nutritional growth period of banana, three-dimensional (3D) point cloud data of two measured fields were obtained by TLS. Second, the point cloud data was preprocessed. And the single plant segmentation of the canopy closed banana plant point cloud was realized furtherly. Finally, the number of banana plants was obtained by counting the number of pseudo-stems, and the diameter of pseudo-stems was measured using a cylindrical segmentation algorithm. A sliding window recognition method was proposed to determine the junction position between leaves and pseudo-stems, and the height of the pseudo-stems was measured. Compared with the measured value of artificial point cloud, when counting the number of banana plants, the precision,recall and percentage error of field 1 were 93.51%, 94.02%, and 0.54% respectively; the precision,recall and percentage error of field 2 were 96.34%, 92.00%, and 4.5% respectively; In the measurement of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana, the root mean square error (RMSE) of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana plant in field 1 were 0.38 cm and 0.2014 m respectively, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were 1.30% and 5.11% respectively; the RMSE of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana plant in field 2 were 0.39 cm and 0.2788 m respectively, and the MAPE were 1.04% and 9.40% respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show that the method proposed in this paper is suitable for the field measurement of banana count, pseudo-stem diameter, and height and can provide a fast field measurement method for banana plantation management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it