Banana plant counting and morphological parameters measurement based on terrestrial laser scanning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of banana plants is closely related to banana yield. The diameter and height of the pseudo-stem are important morphological parameters of banana plants, which can reflect the growth status and vitality. To address the problems of high labor intensity and subjectivity in traditional measurement methods, a fast measurement method for banana plant count, pseudo-stem diameter, and height based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was proposed. RESULTS: First, during the nutritional growth period of banana, three-dimensional (3D) point cloud data of two measured fields were obtained by TLS. Second, the point cloud data was preprocessed. And the single plant segmentation of the canopy closed banana plant point cloud was realized furtherly. Finally, the number of banana plants was obtained by counting the number of pseudo-stems, and the diameter of pseudo-stems was measured using a cylindrical segmentation algorithm. A sliding window recognition method was proposed to determine the junction position between leaves and pseudo-stems, and the height of the pseudo-stems was measured. Compared with the measured value of artificial point cloud, when counting the number of banana plants, the precision,recall and percentage error of field 1 were 93.51%, 94.02%, and 0.54% respectively; the precision,recall and percentage error of field 2 were 96.34%, 92.00%, and 4.5% respectively; In the measurement of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana, the root mean square error (RMSE) of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana plant in field 1 were 0.38 cm and 0.2014 m respectively, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were 1.30% and 5.11% respectively; the RMSE of pseudo-stem diameter and height of banana plant in field 2 were 0.39 cm and 0.2788 m respectively, and the MAPE were 1.04% and 9.40% respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show that the method proposed in this paper is suitable for the field measurement of banana count, pseudo-stem diameter, and height and can provide a fast field measurement method for banana plantation management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".