The CP‐ABM approach for modelling COVID‐19 infection dynamics and quantifying the effects of non‐pharmaceutical interventions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The motivation for this research is to develop an approach that reliably captures the disease dynamics of COVID-19 for an entire population in order to identify the key events driving change in the epidemic through accurate estimation of daily COVID-19 cases. This has been achieved through the new CP-ABM approach which uniquely incorporates Change Point detection into an Agent Based Model taking advantage of genetic algorithms for calibration and an efficient infection centric procedure for computational efficiency. The CP-ABM is applied to the Northern Ireland population where it successfully captures patterns in COVID-19 infection dynamics over both waves of the pandemic and quantifies the significant effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) on a national level for lockdowns and mask wearing. To our knowledge, there is no other approach to date that has captured NPI effectiveness and infection spreading dynamics for both waves of the COVID-19 pandemic for an entire country population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it