MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coupled CFD-MBD numerical modeling of a mechanically coupled WEC array

2022· article· en· W4280528375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsDynamic Systems Analysis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsSolverMooringMarine engineeringFluid–structure interactionWave tankPower (physics)EngineeringSimulationMechanicsAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of new wave energy devices (WECs) has continued unabated over the past decades. For large-scale applications, integrating individual WEC into an array system (WEC net) requires considerable expertise and research due to its highly complex and interrelated nature. Often for a WEC net, it contains main structures and multiple sub-structures. The WEC net response is defined as the total responses from all sub-structures, which is highly complex and closely interconnected with each other. This paper aims to develop a fully-coupled numerical modeling tool that can cope with the wave-structure interaction as well as the mechanical interaction among each sub-structure in a WEC net. The fluid field is solved by a Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) solver coupled with a Multi-body Dynamic structural solver. The hydrodynamic and power take-off performance of Albatern 12S Squid WEC net is studied and the results are validated against available laboratory testing data, and commercial mooring and hydrodynamics analysis software. It is found that the motion response of the CFD and experimental approach is in close agreement with each other. The interaction force among sub-structures can be well captured, and the results indicate that the mode response of individual float is strongly affected by the mechanical linking-arms as well as the incident wave conditions, which is hard to achieve without such integrated CFD tool. The power take-off (PTO) is modeled using a damping system. The predicted peak output power is found to increase with the decreasing of wave period and an optimal device's damping to reach a maximum power capture exists, which is dependent on the incoming wave period and height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it