MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4280539573 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.121.037888

How Much of the Thrombectomy Related Improvement in Functional Outcome Is Already Apparent at 24 Hours and at Hospital Discharge?

2022· article· en· W4280539573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helge Kniep, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Gabriel Broocks, Helena Guerreiro, Noel van Horn, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Milani Deb‐Chatterji, Anna Alegiani, Götz Thomalla, Uta Hanning, Jens Fiehler, Susanne Gellißen, PD Arno Reich, Omid Nikoubashman, Joachim Röther, Bernd Eckert, Michael Braun, Gerhard F. Hamann, PD Eberhard Siebert, Christian H. Nolte, Sarah Zweynert, Georg Böhner, Jan Borggrefe, Peter D. Schellinger, Jörg Berrouschot, Albrecht Bormann, Christoffer Kraemer, Hannes Leischner, Jörg Hattingen, Martina Petersen, Florian Stögbauer, PD Boeckh-Behrens, Silke Wunderlich, Alexander Ludolph, Karl‐Heinz Henn, Christian Gerloff, PD Franziska Dorn, Gabor C. Petzold, Jan Hendrik Schäfer, Fee Keil, Steffen Tiedt, PD Lars Kellert, PD Christoph Trumm, Ulrike Ernemann, Sven Poli, Jan Liman, PD Marielle Ernst, Klaus Gröschel, Timo Uphaus

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzRWTH Aachen UniversityUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleThrombolysisIntracerebral hemorrhageStroke (engine)Odds ratioLogistic regressionCerebral infarctionInternal medicineMiddle cerebral arterySurgeryCardiologyIschemic strokeMyocardial infarctionIschemiaSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early neurological status has been described as predictor of functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation stroke after mechanical thrombectomy. It remains unclear to what proportion the improvement of functional outcome at day 90 is already apparent at 24 hours and at hospital discharge and how later factors impact outcome. METHODS: All patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry (June 2015-December 2019) with anterior circulation stroke and availability of baseline data and neurological status were included. A mediation analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale score ≥2b) on good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90) with mediation through neurological status (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] at 24 hours and at hospital discharge). RESULTS: Three thousand fifty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, thereof 2589 (85%) with successful recanalization and 1180 (39%) with good functional outcome. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, probability of good outcome was significantly associated with age (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.95 [0.94-0.96]), prestroke modified Rankin Scale (0.48 [0.42-0.55]), admission-NIHSS (0.96 [0.94-0.98]), 24-hour NIHSS (0.83 [0.81-0.84]), diabetes (0.56 [0.43-0.72]), proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions (0.78 [0.62-0.97]), passes (0.88 [0.82-0.95]), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (1.07 [1.00-1.14]), successful recanalization (2.39 [1.68-3.43]), intracerebral hemorrhage (0.51 [0.35-0.73]), and recurrent strokes (0.54 [0.32-0.92]). Mediation analysis showed a 20 percentage points (95% CI' 17-24 percentage points) increase of probability of good functional outcome after successful recanalization. Fifty-four percent (95% CI' 44%-66%) of the improvement in functional outcome was explained by 24-hour NIHSS and 75% (95% CI' 62%-90%) by NIHSS at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty-four percent of the improvement in functional outcome after successful recanalization is apparent in NIHSS at 24 hours, 75% in NIHSS at hospital discharge. Other unknown factors not apparent in NIHSS at the 2 time points investigated account for the remaining effect on long term outcome, suggesting, among others, clinical relevance of delayed neurological improvement and deterioration. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03356392.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→