Joint Beamforming and Clustering for Energy Efficient Multi-Cloud Radio Access Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tremendous growth of data traffic in mobile communication networks (MCNs) and the associated exponential increase in mobile devices’ numbers necessitate the use of multi-cloud radio access networks (MC-RANs) as a viable solution to cope with the requirements of next-generation MCNs (6G). In MC-RANs, each central processor (CP) manages the signal processing of its own set of base stations (BSs), and so the system performance becomes a function of the joint intra-cloud and inter-cloud interference mitigation techniques. To this end, this paper considers the problem of maximizing the network-wide energy efficiency (EE) subject to user-to-cloud association, fronthaul capacity, maximum transmit power, and achievable rate constraints, so as to determine the joint beamforming vector of each user and the user-to-cloud association strategy. The paper tackles the non-convex and mixed discrete-continuous nature of the problem formulation using fractional programming (FP) and inner-convex approximation (ICA) techniques, as well as l0-norm relaxation heuristics, and shows how the proposed approach can be implemented in a distributed fashion via a reasonable amount of information exchange across the CPs. The paper simulations highlight the appreciable algorithmic efficiency of the proposed approach over state-of-the-art schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".