MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280540336 · doi:10.1093/europace/euac053.515

Capability of guideline-conform remote atrial high rate episode monitoring with a single-chamber implantable defibrillator with atrial sensing

2022· article· en· W4280540336 on OpenAlexaff
Giampiero Maglia, Gerhard Hindricks, DA Theuns, D. Bar-Lev, Ignasi Anguera, FA Ayala Paredes, Martin Arnold, JC Geller, B Merkely, KM Dyrda, Christian Perings, Sylvain Ploux, J Meyhoefer, Tobias Timmel, Andreas Bollmann

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorGuidelinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): BIOTRONIK, Berlin, Germany Introduction Device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) and their burden progression are associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events in correlation with CHA2DS2-VASc score and AHRE burden. To allow timely initiation of anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of stroke, the European guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) recommend the monitoring of AHRE progression along pre-specified strata (6min…<1h, 1h…<24, ≥24h). We sought to assess the capability of a single-lead implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), that is equipped with an atrial dipole for atrial sensing, to remotely detect and monitor AHRE burden progression in patients with standard indication to single-chamber ICD. Methods From the MATRIX (Management and Detection of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Patients Implanted With BIOTRONIK DX Systems) registry, we analyzed remotely transmitted, and electrogram (IEGM) AHREs in a subset of patients with remote transmissions and without history of long-standing AF at baseline. For each patient, we selected the first occurring episode per duration stratum and the first subsequent occurrence when progressing to a stratum of any longer duration. After episode adjudication by an independent electrophysiologist, we assessed the classification performance of the device (positive predictive value [PPV]) and analyzed AHRE onset and progression pathways. Results Of the MATRIX cohort, 1,746 patients matched the inclusions criteria (see table for patient characteristics) and 1,451 had no AF history. Of the 258 patients with AHREs (14.8%), 450 out of 465 evaluated episodes were correctly classified as AHRE. Reasons for misclassification were artifact (13) and R-wave oversensing (2). PPV was 96.8% (95% confidence interval 94.7%-98.2%). Grouped by stratum, PPV was 93.9%, 99.5% and 100% for 6min…<1h, 1h…<24 and ≥24h, respectively. Ninety six of 240 patients (40.0%) with a first episode according to the pre-specified strata were progressing to a stratum of longer duration and 9 patients (3.8%) had further progression (see Figure). In 119 out of 1,451 patients without AF history (8.2%), the device detected AHRE and 81 of them (4.6% of analysis set) had a mid to high risk for stroke and were not on anticoagulation therapy. In 121 out of 295 patients with known history of paroxysmal and persistent AF (41.0%), the arrhythmia was confirmed by the device. Discussion and Conclusion: The single-chamber ICD with atrial sensing capabilities correctly classified ≈97% of all adjudicated AHREs ≥6min. About 7% of patients had device-detected AHRE onset and/or progression and a mid to high stroke risk. These patients would potentially benefit the most from a guideline-conform AF monitoring strategy to timely initiate anticoagulation medication for stroke prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207