Neuropsychological Performance Is Correlated With Tau Protein Deposition and Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This study characterizes glucose metabolism and tau protein deposition distribution in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and to evaluate the relationships between neuropsychological performance and tau protein deposition or glucose metabolism using 18F-FDG and 18F-AV1451 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Methods Sixty-four patients with β-amyloid-positive (Aβ+) AD and twenty-five healthy participants were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent 18F-FDG and 18F-AV1451 PET/CT. Clinical data and neuropsychological scores were collected. Patients with AD were divided into mild, moderate, and severe groups according to mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores. The standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) for both FDG and AV1451 PET images were calculated using the cerebellar vermis as reference. The SUVRs of the whole cerebral cortex and each brain region were calculated. The volume of interest (VOI) was obtained using automated anatomical atlas (AAL) and Brodmann regions. Student’s t-test was used to perform intergroup comparisons of SUVR. The partial correlation coefficient between SUVR and neuropsychological scores was computed in an inter-subject manner using age and education as covariates. Results The mild subgroup showed a reduction in glucose metabolism and aggregation of tau protein in the temporoparietal cortex. With a decline in neuropsychiatric performance, the SUVR on FDG PET decreased and SUVR on tau PET increased gradually. The areas of glucose metabolism reduction and tau protein deposition appeared first in the parietal cortex, followed by the temporal and frontal cortex, successively. Both FDG and tau SUVRs significantly correlated with MMSE, Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA), auditory verbal learning test (AVLT), Boston naming test (BNT), clock drawing task (CDT), and verbal fluency test (VFT) (p < 0.05). The SUVR on FDG PET significantly correlated with activities of daily living (ADL) and the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD). There was no significant correlation between the tau SUVRs and ADL or HAMD. Conclusion The extension of tau protein deposition was similar but not exactly consistent with the area of glucose metabolism reduction. Both tau and FDG SUVRs correlated with cognitive function in domain-specific patterns, and the results of FDG PET more closely correlated with neuropsychological function than tau PET results did.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".