Retrospective Cohort Study Examining the Correlates of Reported Lifetime Stimulant Use in Persons Diagnosed With Infectious Syphilis in Alberta, Canada, 2018 to 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the correlates for stimulant use in persons diagnosed with infectious syphilis during an outbreak in Alberta to help guide public health interventions. METHODS: Infectious syphilis data were extracted from the Communicable Disease and Outbreak Management database from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. Behavioral, demographic, and lifetime reported stimulant use data were obtained. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression were performed for 3 subpopulations (gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men; men who have sex with women; and women). RESULTS: Of 3627 individuals diagnosed with infectious syphilis, 23.9% (n = 867) cases were not interviewed for substance use and were removed from further analysis. Of the remaining 2759 people, 41.8% (n = 1153) self-reported lifetime stimulant use. Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men reported stimulant use less often than women (24.6% vs. 44.1%; P < 0.0001) and men who have sex with women (24.6% vs. 46.2%; P < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that stimulant use was associated with persons who injected drugs, had correctional involvement, or reported multiple sex partners. Men who have sex with women were more likely to self-report First Nations ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.49]), and women were more likely to have a concurrent gonorrhea infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62 [95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.28]). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of infectious syphilis cases in Alberta reported lifetime nonprescription stimulant use. Infectious syphilis cases with stimulant use were associated with injection drug use, multiple sex partners, and correctional involvement. Our observations highlight the need for integration of sexual health services into programs for people who use substances and those in corrections custody.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".