Detrending-moving-average-based multivariate regression model for nonstationary series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dependency between a response variable and the explanatory variables is a relationship of universal concern in various real-world problems. Multivariate linear regression (MLR) is a well-known method to focus on this issue. However, it is limited to dealing with stationary variables. In this work, we develop a MLR framework based on detrending moving average (DMA) analysis to reveal the actual dependency among variables with nonstationary measures. The DMA-based MLR can generate multiscale regression coefficients, which characterize different dependent behavior at different timescales. Artificial tests show that the DMA-MLR model can successfully resist the impact of trends on the studied series and produce more accurate regression coefficients with multiscale. Furthermore, some scale-dependent statistics are developed to deduce some important relationships in three typical DMA-based MLR models, which help us to deeply understand the DMA-MLR models in theory. The application of the proposed DMA-MLR framework to Beijing's air quality index system demonstrates that fine particulate matter with diameter ≤2.5μm (PM_{2.5}) is the dominant pollutant affecting the air quality of Beijing in recent years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".