Increased interictal synchronicity of respiratory related brain pulsations in epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respiratory brain pulsations have recently been shown to drive electrophysiological brain activity in patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, functional neuroimaging indicates that respiratory brain pulsations have increased variability and amplitude in patients with epilepsy compared to healthy individuals. To determine whether the respiratory drive is altered in epilepsy, we compared respiratory brain pulsation synchronicity between healthy controls and patients. Whole brain fast functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 40 medicated patients with focal epilepsy, 20 drug-naïve patients and 102 healthy controls. Cerebrospinal fluid associated respiratory pulsations were used to generate individual whole brain respiratory synchronization maps, which were compared between groups. Finally, we analyzed the seizure frequency effect and diagnostic accuracy of the respiratory synchronization defect in epilepsy. Respiratory brain pulsations related to the verified fourth ventricle pulsations were significantly more synchronous in patients in frontal, periventricular and mid-temporal regions, while the seizure frequency correlated positively with synchronicity. The respiratory brain synchronicity had a good diagnostic accuracy (ROC AUC = 0.75) in discriminating controls from medicated patients. The elevated respiratory brain synchronicity in focal epilepsy suggests altered physiological effect of cerebrospinal fluid pulsations possibly linked to regional brain water dynamics involved with interictal brain physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".