MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280567925 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20210269

Infertility treatment and postpartum mental illness: a population-based cohort study

2022· article· en· W4280567925 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Natalie Dayan, Maria P. Vélez, Simone N. Vigod, Jessica Pudwell, Maya Djerboua, Deshayne B. Fell, Olga Basso, Tuong Vi Nguyen, K.S. Joseph, Joel G. Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInfertilityMental illnessMedicineCohortPsychiatryPopulationCohort studyObstetricsMental healthPsychologyGynecologyPregnancyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Subfertility and infertility treatment can be stressful experiences, but it is unknown whether each predisposes to postpartum mental illness. We sought to evaluate associations between subfertility or infertility treatment and postpartum mental illness. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of individuals without pre-existing mental illness who gave birth in Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2014, stratified by fertility exposure: subfertility without infertility treatment; noninvasive infertility treatment (intrauterine insemination); invasive infertility treatment (in vitro fertilization); and no reproductive assistance. The primary outcome was mental illness occurring 365 days or sooner after birth (defined as ≥ 2 outpatient visits, an emergency department visit or a hospital admission with a mood, anxiety, psychotic, or substance use disorder, self-harm event or other mental illness). We used multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance to assess associations between fertility exposure and postpartum mental illness. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 786 064 births (mean age 30.42 yr, standard deviation 5.30 yr), including 78 283 with subfertility without treatment, 9178 with noninvasive infertility treatment, 9633 with invasive infertility treatment and 688 970 without reproductive assistance. Postpartum mental illness occurred in 60.8 per 1000 births among individuals without reproductive assistance. Relative to individuals without reproductive assistance, those with subfertility had a higher adjusted relative risk of postpartum mental illness (1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.17), which was similar in noninvasive and invasive infertility treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: Subfertility or infertility treatment conferred a slightly higher risk of postpartum mental illness compared with no reproductive assistance. Further research should elucidate whether the stress of infertility, its treatment or physician selection contributes to this association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207