MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280568413 · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.6725

Incorrect Spelling of Author Name

2022· erratum· en· W4280568413 on OpenAlexaff
Tarek Taifour, Ezekiel Emanuel, David Michaels, Rick A. Bright

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Biological Sciences
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersVerily Life SciencesInstitute for New Economic Thinking
KeywordsMedicineSpellingClassicsLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibhu Parcha, MD; Gargya Malla, MD, MPH, PhD; Marguerite R. Irvin, PhD; Nicole D. Armstrong, PhD; Suzanne E. Judd, PhD; Leslie A. Lange, PhD; Mathew S. Maurer, MD; Emily B. Levitan, ScD; Parag Goyal, MD, MSc; Garima Arora, MD; Pankaj Arora, MD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMASame topicMedical and Biological SciencesFrench-language works237,207