MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280572813 · doi:10.1093/europace/euac053.455

Incidence of premature battery depletion in subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Insights from a multicenter registry

2022· article· en· W4280572813 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Luker, Marc Strik, Alexandre Raymond-Paquin, Mohamed ElRefai, Óscar Cano Pérez, Hilton Franqui-Rivera, Alexander Pott, C Veltmann, J Schmitt, Jason Collinson, Amw Van Stipdonk, N Fluschnik, A Haeberiln, Jason G. Andrade, Daniel Steven

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical endpointIncidence (geometry)Emergency medicineMulticenter studyImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorBattery (electricity)PediatricsMedical emergencySurgeryInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction A subset of more than 35,000 S-ICD is under FDA advisory, warning of the potential of premature battery depletion (PBD), caused by a faulty low-voltage capacitor. Based on internal data, the manufacturer projects the incidence at 3.7% after 5 years. Data independent from the manufacturer is sparse. Methods This study was a multicenter effort of 14 centers in Europe, the US, and Canada. Consecutive patients who received a S-ICD at the participating centers were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients with the 1010 S-ICD generator model, and those without available follow-up information were excluded. Data was collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University Hospital Cologne. The primary endpoint in this registry was device explantation, generator replacement, or generator failure. Reasons for explantation, replacement, or failure were collected. Device longevity was defined in months. It was calculated as the time from device insertion to the time of replacement, or explantation, or failure, where applicable. Premature battery depletion was defined as the occurrence of battery depletion requiring generator replacement after 60 months or less. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committee approval was obtained. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov. Results Data of n=1,102 S-ICD devices was analyzed. The registry comprised of S-ICD generators implanted between 03/2015 and 09/2021 (43.4% A209 model and 56.6% A219 model). Of these, 611 devices (55.4%) were identified by the Boston Scientific serial number lookup tool as affected by the advisory. The mean and median follow-up duration was 2.43±1.66 and 2.29 years, respectively. During follow-up, 110 devices (10%) were explanted after 2.9±1.7 years. Battery depletion was the indication in 52. The endpoint of PBD (battery depletion after less than 5 years) was met in 37 devices (6% of the devices under advisory), after 4.1±0.6 years. In 58 cases, the S-ICD was explanted for reasons other than battery depletion. Infection (16), system upgrade (20), heart transplant or LVAD therapy (7), and inappropriate shocks or inappropriate sensing (7) were the most common indications. Discussion This registry provides a systematic and manufacturer independent analysis of premature battery depletion in S-ICD patients. In the affected devices, the incidence of premature battery occurred in 6%. This is higher than what is projected by the manufacturer. The rate of PBD increases notably around the 4-year mark. Conclusion S-ICD generators under advisory suffer from PBD at a higher incidence than previously reported. Patients equipped with these devices should be closely monitored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207