MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280573097 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2022.108281

Dataset of temperature, heat flux and infrared emission from flat premixed laminar methane-air flames

2022· article· en· W4280573097 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja Pelzmann, Étienne Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustorLaminar flowThermocoupleHeat fluxInfraredPremixed flameMethaneAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Context (archaeology)CombustionTemperature measurementCalibrationGas burnerMaterials scienceAdiabatic flame temperatureChemistryThermodynamicsOpticsHeat transferEnvironmental chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To enable the use of flat flame burners in the context of fire resistance testing, we present a data set covering temperature, infrared emission and heat 15 mm above the burner. A laminar premixed methane-air flame is characterized for eleven different fuel/air ratios, ranging from lean (0.9) to rich (1.45), extending an existing a widely used reference [1]. We provide complementing flame temperature readings from thermocouple measurements that can be used for calibration. In addition, broadband flame optical emissions are acquired in the visual (VIS) and the infrared (IR) spectral region. Chemiluminescence measurements reveal the spatial distribution of the OH* radicals. Heat flux density measurements with a water-cooled gauge are also provided. Finally, the expected species concentration, velocity, temperature are obtained from chemical kinetics calculations. Ambient conditions and burner control parameters are presented as supplementary data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207