PREFERENCES OF RENT GARAGE OWNERS IN LOCATION SELECTION IN DALUNG VILLAGE, BADUNG REGENCY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Dalung Village, a residential development area in North Kuta District, Badung Regency, has many densely populated residential areas, yet the areas are not supported by adequate parking facilities. It is then used by the community around the residential areas to develop a rental garage business resulting in the direction of land use in Dalung Village in the current settlement designation area developing towards trade and services. This study aimed to determining the factors that become rental garage owner’s preferences in choosing the location of a rental garage related to the characteristics of land use in Dalung Village. The research method used was a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data was collected through field observations, interviews and distribution of google form questionnaires to rental garage owner’s. The results of this study indicate that the community's preference were the factor of the residential environment with lots of parking on the shoulders, the density factor of the number of vehicles that passed on public roads and environmental roads, environmental safety factors, capital and maintenance efficiency factors as well as the presence of similar businesses (rental garage) in an residential areas. The factor that made land use occurred was the lack of firmness of the Dalung village government and Badung district government in make arrangement for regional spatial planning areas and providing sanctions for violations of village spatial planning.<strong></strong></p><p> </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it