Assessing the genomic diversity and relatedness in 10 Canadian heritage chicken lines using whole‐genome sequence data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past 50 years, there has been a steep increase in the demand for poultry products, met by increasing production along with genetic selection for improved growth, efficiency, health and reproduction. The selection tends to reduce the number and type of genetic resources contributing to the majority of production. The University of Alberta maintains 10 heritage chicken lines (Brown Leghorn (BL), Light Sussex (LS), New Hampshire (NH), Saskatchewan Barred Rock (SaskBR), Shaver Barred Rock (ShaverBR), Shaver Rhode Island Red (RIR), White Leghorn (WL) and three commercial crosses called Alberta Meat Control strains 1957 (AMC-1957), 1978 sire line (AMC-1978-20S) and 1978 dam line (AMC-1978-30D), that played a large role in the evolution of the poultry industry in Canada. Since these lines have not been subjected to the same intensive selection pressures as commercial counterparts, they may contain unique genetic variants lost in commercial lines. Thus, for conservation management of these lines, the first step is to assess their genetic diversity. 71 male samples from across 10 lines were analysed using whole-genome sequencing and patterns of genetic diversity and relatedness among these lines were explored. AMC-1978-30D showed the highest genetic diversity as reflected in observed and expected heterozygosity (0.327 and 0.250), percentage of polymorphic markers (~ 65%) and average recent inbreeding coefficient (-0.039), followed by AMC-1978-20S and AMC-1957. BL showed the lowest genetic diversity as reflected in observed and expected heterozygosity (0.130 and 0.116), percentage of polymorphic markers (~31%) and average recent inbreeding coefficient (0.577), followed by LS, WL and NH. Our findings highlight the need for special attention for the populations of BL, WL, LS and NH, with the largest levels of inbreeding. Our results can be used to develop a breeding strategy to optimize and conserve the genetic variation present in heritage lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".