Traductores, censores y editoriales transatlánticas: la circulación de Primavera Negra de Henry Miller en España (1960-1980)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo analizo la importación y circulación de la novela Black Spring de Henry Miller (1936) en España durante las dos últimas décadas del franquismo (1965-1975). El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar el papel de los agentes involucrados en las versiones de la obra que circularon en castellano y en catalán: desde los censores que operaban dentro del sistema de censura establecido por el régimen, pasando por las editoriales y sus fines lucrativos, hasta los traductores, encargados de reproducir la obra de Miller en tan convulsas circunstancias históricas. Por tanto utilizaré el archivo para estudiar los diferentes procesos de circulación de la obra en España, además de las traducciones como productos literarios. Tendré en cuenta la traducción al castellano de Patricio Canto (1964), Ediciones Rueda (Argentina); la traducción al catalán de Jordi Arbonès (1970), Aymà (España); y la versión en castellano de Carlos Bauer y Julián Marcos (1978), Alfaguara-Bruguera (España).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".