MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280595503 · doi:10.24875/acm.21000135

Función contráctil auricular y fibrosis en pacientes con fibrilación auricular paroxística en ritmo sinusal

2022· article· es· W4280595503 on OpenAlexaff
Ashikhmin Yaroslav, Drapkina Oxana

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos de cardiología de México · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSinus rhythmInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationCardiologyEjection fractionFibrosisHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate atrial contractile function in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in sinus rhythm using transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG). Methods and results: Thirty-five patients with paroxysmal AF and arterial hypertension (mean age 62 ± 10 years, 43% male) in sinus rhythm were enrolled in the study. The control group was composed of comparable patients with arterial hypertension without heart rhythm disturbances. EchoCG was performed during sinus rhythm according to an extended protocol, which included the ejection fraction (EF) of the left atrium (LA) and tissue Doppler measurements. Myocardial fibrosis was assessed quantitatively by videodensitometry in intraventricular and intraatrial (IAS) septa using an original image post-processing algorithm. We found a significant decrease in the left atrial contraction function during sinus rhythm in patients with AF when compared to controls. LA EF (34 ± 14 vs. 54 ± 17, p = 0.03) and A' velocity (0.17 ± 0.04 vs. 0.22 ± 0.04, p = 0.008) decreased while A/A' ratio (2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.9 ± 0.1, p = 0.006) increased. Peak A velocity was not affected. Videodensitometric analysis revealed a 2.3-fold increase in IAS fibrosis fraction in AF patients compared with controls (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with AF in sinus rhythm have markedly depressed atrial contractile function. Videodensitometry of IAS has the potential to be used as inexpensive method of atrial fibrosis assessment in patients with AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos de cardiología de MéxicoSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207