Clinically Detected Leg Length Discrepancy in Patients With Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity: Prevalence and Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the prevalence and outcomes of patients with idiopathic clubfoot and clinically detected limb length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of idiopathic clubfoot patients in a Research Ethics Board-approved clubfoot registry. Patients with LLD ≥0.5 cm (LLD+) were compared with those with no or <0.5 cm LLD (LLD-). LLD was determined by documented clinical examination. Exclusion criteria included nonidiopathic clubfoot deformity, <2-year follow-up, and incomplete records. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients included, 27 (9.0%) had an LLD, of whom 23 patients had a unilateral clubfoot deformity. The prevalence of LLD was 15.3% and 2.67% in unilateral and bilateral clubfoot patients, respectively. The mean LLD was 1.21 cm (0.5 to 3.5 cm, SD: 0.78 cm) in LLD+ patients, with a mean of 1.27 cm (SD: 0.79 cm) in unilateral clubfoot patients and 0.88 cm (SD: 0.75 cm) in bilateral patients. The total number of casts applied in LLD+ unilateral clubfoot patients was significantly higher than in LLD- unilateral patients (9.5 vs. 6.8 casts; P =0.015). The overall relapse rate in all patients was 30.3% and was significantly higher in the unilateral only LLD+ group [relative risk (RR)=2.89] and the total LLD+ patient cohort (RR=1.68). The risk of repeat casting for relapse was also higher in the unilateral LLD+ group (RR=2.45) and the total LLD+ group (RR=1.87). The risk of surgery for relapse was significantly higher in the unilateral LLD+ group for any surgery ( P =0.046), and most specifically for open tendo-Achilles tenotomy ( P =0.008) and tibialis anterior tendon transfer ( P =0.019). There was no correlation between the severity of LLD and Pirani score at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: LLD was present in 9% of idiopathic clubfoot patients, and most were <2 cm. There is a significantly higher risk of relapse in patients with unilateral clubfoot and LLD. The risk of surgery overall was higher in all patients with a unilateral LLD. Assessment of LLD should be routinely performed in clubfoot patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".