Joining of Zirconium Alloys to Nickel Bearing Alloys for In-Core Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Zirconium alloys are well-positioned as the material of choice for nuclear in-core structures since they have a low neutron absorption cross section and possess good material properties under elevated neutron flux and high-temperature operating conditions. The Canadian supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) concept pressure tube includes a transition from zirconium-tin alloy (Excel) to a yet to be selected stainless steel to allow it to be seal welded to the inlet plenum. Thus, a method to join zirconium and its alloys to ferrous and nickel-bearing alloys is desired. To this end, a series of experiments were carried out to demonstrate the feasibility of this method. A joint approaching the strength of the parent material was achieved using both rotary friction welding and co-extrusion methods, although the joints exhibited lower ductility than that of the parent material. Microstructural examination of the joint revealed a ∼200 nm to ∼1 μm intermetallic layer at the transition zone, which was the location of failure in the tensile specimen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".