MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280619805 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwac056.291

Screening for QTc prolongation during acute exercise in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors

2022· article· en· W4280619805 on OpenAlexaffabout
E Bertrand, Maxime Caru, V Lemay, Grégor Andelfinger, Caroline Laverdière, M. Krajinovic, Daniel Sinnett, Vincent Jacquemet, Daniel Curnier

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQT intervalCardiorespiratory fitnessCardiotoxicitySubclinical infectionInternal medicineCardiologyLong QT syndromePhysical therapyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) of the Canadian Institutes ofHealth Research (CIHR), C17 Council Background Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) survivors. Electrophysiologic complications and cardiac autonomic dysfunction are both known to be developed by childhood ALL survivors. Current methods for detection of cardiotoxicity have limitations, particularly due to their lack of sensitivity for early detection of subclinical cardiac dysfunction. Early detection of cardiac dysfunction remains a cardiologist’s challenge and is essential to allow optimal therapeutic intervention. Purpose This study aimed to observe ventricular repolarization during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in childhood ALL survivors. We hypothesized that cancer treatments lead to changes in ventricular repolarization that persist over time, and that the use of CPET allows the unmasking of electrophysiological abnormalities. Methods A total of 250 childhood ALL survivors underwent a maximal CPET on an ergocycle, and their direct oxygen uptake was measured. All survivors were monitored continuously during the test using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. Measurements of the QT interval were completed at rest, at the end of each stage of the CPET, and during recovery. The QT interval was defined as the period from the onset of the Q-wave to the end of the T-wave, measured linearly. Values were corrected (QTc) using a specific group equation. To compare the effect of cardiorespiratory fitness on QTc during CPET, participants were divided in two groups according to the median of survivors’ cardiorespiratory fitness (group A: <32.0 mL.kg-1.min-1; group B: ≥32.0 mL.kg-1.min-1). Results All survivors (median age: 21 years, 51.5% male) included in the final analysis (n=200) performed a validated maximal CPET. At rest, the QTc interval was 379.1±32.2ms. None of the participants had a prolonged QTc during exercise (371.5±16.1ms, range 310.7-416.1ms). The mean QTc interval during CPET was not different between groups A and B (370.1±17.6ms and 373.0±14.4ms, p=0.218). Group A had a longer QT interval at low to moderate exercise intensities. During recovery, the QTc interval was 373.4.1±16.2ms. Conclusions Cancer and anthracycline treatments have an impact on the cardiorespiratory system. Low cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood ALL survivors is associated with longer ventricular repolarization during exercise. These differences may be an indicator of altered cardiac function. This shows the importance of studying the response to exercise to improve early cardiac dysfunction detection, as well as documenting the autonomic nervous system response to exercise between survivors with lower and higher physical fitness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207