MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280620146 · doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac8890

Horizons: nuclear astrophysics in the 2020s and beyond

2022· article· en· W4280620146 on OpenAlex
H. Schatz, Ana Delia Becerril Reyes, A. Best, Edward F. Brown, Katerina Chatziioannou, K. A. Chipps, C. M. Deibel, Rana Ezzeddine, D. K. Galloway, C. J. Hansen, F. Herwig, Alexander P. Ji, Maria Lugaro, Z. Meisel, Don Norman, Julie Read, Leslie Roberts, A. Spyrou, Ingo Tews, F. X. Timmes, C. Travaglio, Nicole Vassh, C. Abia, P. Adsley, Shantanu Agarwal, M. Aliotta, Wako Aoki, A. Arcones, A. Aryan, Avrajit Bandyopadhyay, A. Banu, D. W. Bardayan, Jennifer Barnes, Andreas Bauswein, T.C. Beers, J. Bishop, Tuğba Boztepe, Benoît Côté, M. E. Caplan, A.E. Champagne, J. A. Clark, M. Couder, A. Couture, S. E. de Mink, Shiladittya Debnath, R. J. deBoer, Jacqueline den Hartogh, Pavel A. Denissenkov, Verônica Dexheimer, I. Dillmann, J.E. Escher, M. Famiano, R. Farmer, Robert Fisher, C. Fröhlich, Anna Frebel, Chris L. Fryer, G. A. Fuller, A.K. Ganguly, S. Ghosh, B. K. Gibson, Tyler Gorda, Konstantinos N. Gourgouliatos, Vanessa Graber, Manoj Gupta, W. C. Haxton, Alexander Heger, W. R. Hix, Wynn C. G. Ho, Erika M. Holmbeck, A.A. Hood, Sabrina Huth, G. Imbriani, R. G. Izzard, Richa Jain, H. Jayatissa, Zac Johnston, Toshitaka Kajino, A. Kankainen, G. Kiss, A. A. Kwiatkowski, M. La Cognata, A. M. Laird, L. Lamia, Philippe Landry, E. Laplace, Kristina D. Launey, D. A. Leahy, G. Leckenby, A. Lennarz, B. Longfellow, A. E. Lovell, W.G. Lynch, S. Lyons, Keiichi Maeda, E. Masha, C. Matei, Jaroslav Merc, B. Messer, F. Montes, Arunava Mukherjee, Matthew R. Mumpower, David Neto, Bill Nevins, William G. Newton, Lam-Duy Nguyen, Ken‐Ichi Nishikawa, Nobuya Nishimura, F. M. Nunes, Evan O’Connor, Brian W. O’Shea, W.-J. Ong, S. D. Pain, Michael A. Pajkos, M. Pignatari, R. G. Pizzone, Vinicius M. Placco, T. Plewa, B. Pritychenko, A. Psaltis, D. Puentes, Y.‐Z. Qian, David Radice, D. Rapagnani, B. Rebeiro, R. Reifarth, A.L. Richard, N. Rijal, Ian U. Roederer, J S Rojo, Jyo K, Y. Saito, A. Schwenk, M. L. Sergi, R. S. Sidhu, A. Simon, T. Sivarani, Á. Skúladóttir, M. S. Smith, A. Spiridon, T. M. Sprouse, S. Starrfield, Andrew W. Steiner, F. Strieder, I. Sultana, Rebecca Surman, T. Szücs, Abdel Nasser Tawfik, F.‐K. Thielemann, L. Trache, R. Trappitsch, M. B. Tsang, А. Туміно, S. Upadhyayula, J O Valle Martínez, M. Van der Swaelmen, C. Viscasillas Vázquez, Anna L. Watts, Benjamin Wehmeyer, M. Wiescher, C. Wrede, Jinmi Yoon, R. G. T. Zegers, Mohammed Akram Zermane, M. Zingale

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoTRIUMFMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Victoria
FundersExtreMe Matter Institute, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungEmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaEuropean Cooperation in Science and TechnologyGSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNuclear astrophysicsField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsAstrophysicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nuclear astrophysics is a field at the intersection of nuclear physics and astrophysics, which seeks to understand the nuclear engines of astronomical objects and the origin of the chemical elements. This white paper summarizes progress and status of the field, the new open questions that have emerged, and the tremendous scientific opportunities that have opened up with major advances in capabilities across an ever growing number of disciplines and subfields that need to be integrated. We take a holistic view of the field discussing the unique challenges and opportunities in nuclear astrophysics in regards to science, diversity, education, and the interdisciplinarity and breadth of the field. Clearly nuclear astrophysics is a dynamic field with a bright future that is entering a new era of discovery opportunities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it