Late-magmatic processes in the St. Lawrence Granite: Implications for fluorite mineralization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The St. Lawrence Granite (SLG), located in the Avalon Zone of the Appalachian Orogeny, is a peralkaline to metaluminous granite, best known for its association with extensive, and economically significant, fluorite deposits. Genetic models for the fluorite mineralization have been proposed, but major gaps and misconceptions still remain, such as the lack of fluorite in the country rocks, the source of Ca to form fluorite and the locally abundant calcite in the fluorite veins and the granite. Petrography, geochemistry and electron microprobe analysis revealed new details on the late-magmatic processes in the granite that played a significant role in fluorite mineralization. The SLG intruded at shallow levels and comprises several phases, each having different textures, mineralogy, and geochemistry. Most of the fluorite deposits are associated with the East lobe (E lobe), which is the only peralkaline and one of the most intensely altered phases of the granite. Alteration and fluorite mineralization are the results of devolatilization of the granite. The volatiles included F, Cl, CO2 and water. Early exsolution of a F-rich vapour, followed by a F-rich acidic fluid led to the fluorite mineralization. In the later stages, a F-poor and CO2-rich fluid was left and was unable to leave the granite, migrated along the upper contact of the granite and accumulated in the cupolas resulting in late carbonatization and extensive autometasomatism. Exsolution of a F-rich vapour, coupled with the shallow depth of intrusion of the SLG, allowed the F to leave the granite leading to fluorite mineralization in the country rocks, as demonstrated by the AGS fluorite deposit, which is partially hosted in sedimentary rocks overlying the granite; this encourages further exploration in the surrounding rocks. The source of the Ca is from the alteration of primary Ca-bearing feldspar and amphiboles in the granite, implying the lack of spatial correlation between fluorite mineralization and Ca-containing country rocks. This is significant for pursuing further exploration for fluorite in the St. Lawrence area, and elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".