MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280624204 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202112-2761oc

COVID-19 in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: A National Prospective Cohort Study

2022· article· en· W4280624204 on OpenAlexaff
David Montani, Marie-Caroline Certain, Jason Weatherald, Xavier Jaïs, Sophie Bulifon, Elise Noël‐Savina, Ana Nieves, Sébastien Renard, Julie Traclet, Hélène Bouvaist, Marianne Riou, Pascal de Groote, Pamela Moceri, Laurent Bertoletti, Nicolas Favrolt, Anne Guillaumot, Etienne‐Marie Jutant, Antoine Beurnier, Athénaïs Boucly, Nathan Ebstein, Mitja Jevnikar, Jérémie Pichon, Sophia Keddache, Mariana Preda, Anne Roche, Sabina Solinas, Andrei Seferian, Martine Reynaud‐Gaubert, Vincent Cottin, Laurent Savale, Marc Humbert, Olivier Sitbon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de PoitiersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NantesRégion NormandieUniversity Hospital of MartiniqueHospices Civils de LyonInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionInternal medicineProspective cohort studyDiabetes mellitusKidney diseaseCohort studyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with pulmonary endothelial dysfunction. There are limited data available on the outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), a disease characterized by pulmonary endothelial dysfunction. Objectives To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with precapillary PH and COVID-19. Methods We prospectively collected characteristics, management, and outcomes of adult patients with precapillary PH in the French PH network who had COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Clinical, functional, and hemodynamic characteristics of PH before COVID-19 were collected from the French PH registry. Measurements and Main Results A total of 211 patients with PH (including 123 with pulmonary arterial hypertension, 47 with chronic thromboembolic PH, and 41 with other types of PH) experienced COVID-19, and 40.3% of them were outpatients, 32.2% were hospitalized in a conventional ward, and 27.5% were in an ICU. Among hospitalized patients (n = 126), 54.0% received corticosteroids, 37.3% high-flow oxygen, and 11.1% invasive ventilation. Right ventricular and acute renal failure occurred in 30.2% and 19.8% of patients, respectively. Fifty-two patients (all hospitalized) died from COVID-19. Overall mortality was 24.6% (95% CI [confidence interval], 18.8–30.5) and in-hospital mortality 41.3% (95% CI, 32.7–49.9). Nonsurvivors were significantly older, more frequently male and suffering comorbidities (diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, systemic hypertension, chronic cardiac diseases, and/or chronic renal failure), and had more severe PH at their most recent evaluation preceding COVID-19 diagnosis (in terms of functional class and 6-minute-walk distance; all P < 0.05). Use of pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy was similar between survivors and nonsurvivors. Conclusions COVID-19 in patients with precapillary PH was associated with a high in-hospital mortality. The typical risk factors for severe COVID-19 and severity of PH were associated with mortality in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207