MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280626893 · doi:10.1093/europace/euac053.214

Safety and acute performance of paroxysmal and early persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using temperature-controlled, very high power, short duration catheter with a new radiofrequency generator

2022· article· en· W4280626893 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurent Macle, GM Nair, Allan C. Skanes, Martín Aguilar, Alfredo Pantano, Yaariv Khaykin, Atul Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSouthlake Regional Health CenterLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of OttawaMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterAblationAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationCardiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Biosense Webster Inc. Background/Introduction The temperature-controlled contact force radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter (QDM) has 6 thermocouples to maintain target catheter tip temperature and 3 tip microelectrodes for high local signal resolution. It has an enhanced irrigation profile to reduce char formation. Three prospective multicenter trials demonstrated safety and effectiveness of the QDM catheter using very high-power, short duration (vHPSD; 90W/4s), conventional power (CP; ≤50W) or combined modes. These studies were performed with an older RF generator. A new generator was developed to support the full suite of legacy, temperature controlled and multichannel ablation catheters, but has not yet been formally tested in a clinical setting. Purpose Evaluate safety and acute performance of the QDM catheter with the new 90W-enabled generator. Methods This prospective, multicenter study (4 Canadian sites) used vHPSD as primary mode for Pulmonary Vein (PV) isolation with overlapping 3mm lesion tags for anterior, inferior and roof of left atrium. Adjacent, non-overlapping lesions were used posteriorly to avoid esophageal heating. CP mode was used at operator discretion for thicker atrial tissue, touch ups, and non-PV triggers (Figure). Primary endpoint was confirmed entrance block in all PVs after adenosine and/or isoproterenol challenge. Acute procedural and safety data were assessed. Systematic char evaluation was performed. Results Effectiveness analysis included 38/40 subjects with mean 110-day follow up (mean age, 61.7 ± 9.5 years; 63.2% male). Hypertension (47.4%) and congestive heart failure (15.8%) were the most common comorbidities. Fourteen subjects were treated with version V0 of the generator, and 24 subjects were treated using version V1c which included further software adjustments to the power titration, and current response to optimize performance. Combination vHPSD/CP workflow was used for PV isolation in 28 (75.7%) subjects and vHPSD was used solely in 10. A non-study catheter was used in 1 subject during connectivity troubleshooting. Primary endpoint of entrance block confirmation was achieved in 37/38 subjects and in all 37 subjects treated with study catheter only. No incidences of char or device-related adverse events were reported. There were no noted differences in the endpoints evaluated between the V0 and V1c groups. Median (Q1/Q3) RF application times for ablating PVs was 13.0 min (9.0/16.0) for the entire cohort. Median (Q1/Q3) time to achieve PV isolation in vHPSD-only group was 9 (7/12) min, and 14 (11/18) min, respectively. Conclusion(s) Consistent with data from prior 3 clinical studies, QDM catheter with the new 90W-enabled generator demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled AF ablation with short PV ablation time and no char observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207