MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

एपए सत ससकरणक परवधनहर [Provisions of the seventh edition of APA]

2022· article· ne· W4280627494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
खगेन्द्र Khagendra घोडासैनी Ghodasaini

Bibliographic record

VenueHaimaprabha · 2022
Typearticle
Languagene
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)TypographyLibrary scienceComputer scienceCitationVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

प्रस्तुत लेख एपिए सातौँ संस्करणका प्रावधानहरू खोजी गर्ने उद्देश्यले तयार पारिएको हो । यसमा एपिए ढाँचाका प्रावधानसँग सम्बन्धित समस्याको समाधान गर्ने प्रयास गरिएको छ । यसमा दस्तावेजको विश्लेषणमा आधारित गुणात्मक ढाँचा अवलम्बन गरी सोद्देश्यमूलक नमुना छनोट विधि अपनाइएको छ । एपिएका प्रावधानहरूको वर्णन र विश्लेषण गरिएको यस लेखमा एपिए शैलीलाई नै सैद्धान्तिक पर्याधार बनाइएको छ । अनुसन्धानको प्रस्तुति गर्ने एपिए, एमएलए, सिकागो स्टाइल, तुरेबियन स्टाइल, वेन्कुवर स्टाइल, हावर्ट स्टाइल र ब्रिली चाइनिज साइटेसन स्टाइल गाइडजस्ता बहुप्रचलित ढाँचाहरू रहेका छन् । तीमध्ये एपिए ढाँचाको प्रयोग वाङ्मयका शिक्षा, विज्ञानलगायतका विभिन्न क्षेत्रमा गरिन्छ । एपिएको सर्वप्रथम प्रकाशन सन् १९२९ मा भएको थियो भने २०२० मा यसको सातौँ संस्करण प्रकाशित भएको छ । यसमा गुणात्मक, परिमाणात्मक र मिश्रित अनुसन्धान विधिको चर्चासँगै अनुसन्धानात्मक लेख, प्रतिवेदन तथा पुस्तकहरू सेटिङ गर्ने तरिकाबारे पनि उल्लेख गरिएको छ । यसमा अनुसन्धानको भाषाशैली, छपाइ प्रविधि, वर्णविन्यास, पृष्ठाङ्कन, मार्जिन छोडाइ, अङ्क, तथ्याङ्कको प्रयोगका तरिका, उद्धरण, टिप्पणी र भावहरणका तरिकादेखि लेख, पुस्तक र विद्युतीय माध्यममा प्रकाशित सामग्रीको सन्दर्भाङ्कन गर्ने तरिकालाई सरलीकृत गरिएको छ । अङ्ग्रेजी भाषामा पहुँच नभएका नेपाली, संस्कृत, मैथिली, थारु, नेवारी आदि भाषामा एपिए शैलीको प्रयोग गर्न चाहने अनुसन्धाताहरूका लागि उपयोगी हुने निष्कर्ष निकालिएको छ । [This article is intended to explore the provisions of the seventh edition of the APA. It attempts to resolve issues related to the provisions of the APA framework. In this, purposeful sample selection method has been adopted by adopting qualitative format based on the analysis of the document. This article describes and analyzes the provisions of the APA, making the APA style the theoretical basis. There are many popular formats for presenting research, such as APA, MLA, Chicago style, Turbian style, Vancouver style, Howart style and Brilliant Chinese citation style guide. Among them, the APA format is used in various fields including classical education and science. The first edition of APA was published in 1929 and the seventh edition was published in 2020. It discusses qualitative, quantitative and mixed research methods as well as how to set up research articles, reports and books. This includes research language style, printing techniques, typography, layout, margin skipping, numbers, usage of data, quotes, the methods of commenting and commenting on the content of articles, books and electronic media have been simplified. It has been concluded that, it will be useful for researchers who want to use APA style in Nepali, Sanskrit, Maithili, Tharu, Newari etc. languages, ​​who do not have access to English language.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.013
Scholarly communication0.0190.009
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0110.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaimaprabhaSame topicGlobal Socioeconomic and Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207