IMPACT OF ABRATION ON LAND USE IN COASTAL AREA BULELENG REGENCY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Coastal damage due to abrasion and wave erosion in Buleleng Regency is very potential, even information from the Buleleng Regency Marine Service released information that the length of the coast in Buleleng Regency which has been damaged is not less than 5 km. Abrasion and wave erosion resulting in erosion of the coastline and will continue to affect land use. In this study using quantitative methods with analysis stages consisting of, among others, land use and analysis of the impact of abrasion on land use. The analysis carried out is a Geographic Information System (GIS) based analysis in accordance with the needs of the research in spatial terms. The conclusions obtained from this study are the types of land use that exist in the Coastal District of Buleleng Regency are in the form of airports, lakes / reservoirs, forests, mangroves, stretches of beach sand, ports, plantations / gardens, paddy fields, rivers, moor and shrubs. The abrasion that occurs in the Coastal Zone of Buleleng Regency every year with vulnerability during 2013 - 2019 has an impact on land use changes. This can be seen through the results of overlapping overlay analysis and seeing the area of land use that has changed.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it