MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4280642903 · doi:10.1255/tosf.153

Challenges of sampling grain for mycotoxin analysis

2022· article· en· W4280642903 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sheryl A. Tittlemier

Bibliographic record

VenueTOS forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycotoxinOchratoxin AOchratoxinAnimal scienceEnvironmental scienceFood scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During growth and post-harvest storage, fungi can infect grain and produce secondary metabolites known as “mycotoxins ”. Some mycotoxins are regulated due to their potential hazardous health effects. Thusly, analysis of bulk grain consignments for mycotoxins is common in the grain trade. The heterogeneity of bulk grain with respect to deoxynivalenol (DON) and ochratoxin A (OTA), two regulated mycotoxins, was investigated. Variation of concentrations amongst individual wheat kernels was assessed, along with the variation within sub-samples and test portions produced from 10 kg laboratory samples, and amongst 500 t increments sampled during loading of bulk shipments (4,600 to 55,000 t). Concentrations in individual kernels ranged from < 0.02 to 583 mg/kg for OTA and < 0.3 to 414 mg/kg for DON. Analysis of the distribution of concentrations was limited due to the difference between the sample sets available for use; one was naturally infected (DON) and the other was inoculated and incubated under laboratory conditions (OTA). Bulk shipments were sampled during loading using a Canadian Grain Commission-approved automated cross-stream diverter-type sampler and in-line divider. Increments were combined, and 10 kg laboratory samples were prepared from the resulting composite using a Boerner divider, comminuted using a rotor beater mill, and sub-sampled using rotary sample division to produce representative sub-samples and test portions. Concentrations of OTA in the 500 t increment samples varied from < 0.25 to 22.9 µg/kg; DON varied from < 0.05 to 0.67 mg/kg. Within shipments, the OTA concentrations varied more amongst increments than did DON. The coefficients of variation for OTA ranged from 42 to 95% which were 2-4× greater than for DON. The results illustrate heterogeneity of bulk wheat relevant to international trade and regulated mycotoxins. Differences observed for DON and OTA also reflect how biological differences in mycotoxin production contributes to the challenges faced in analysing bulk whole grain for mycotoxins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOS forumSame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207